[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Index: apr_hash.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/include/apr_hash.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.18
> retrieving revision 1.19
> diff -u -u -r1.18 -r1.19
> --- apr_hash.h 2001/01/11 00:13:22 1.18
> +++ apr_hash.h 2001/01/11 08:37:45 1.19
> @@ -174,12 +174,12 @@
> apr_size_t *klen, void **val);
>
> /**
> - * Get the number of keys in the hash table.
> + * Get the number of key/value pairs in the hash table.
> * @param ht The hash table
> - * @param count Return pointer for the number of keys
> + * @return The number of key/value pairs in the hash table.
> * @deffunc void apr_hash_count(apr_hash_t *ht, apr_size_t *count);
> */
> -APR_DECLARE(void) apr_hash_count(apr_hash_t *ht, apr_size_t *count);
> +APR_DECLARE(apr_size_t) apr_hash_count(apr_hash_t *ht);
silly question: why not int or apr_int32_t instead of apr_size_t?
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
