> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 8:04 PM > > > > any ideas howto workaround this? > > > and any plans on adding largefile support to 2.0? > > > > If it's supported I'd like to see it (Win32 does). However, we need to > > make an executive decision. Does apr (ignoring the httpd issue for the > > moment, do we have programs faulting over arithmetic conversions, or > > define apr_off_t as apr_int64_t? There are faults to both methods. > > I guess I would like to see us add --with-largefile, and let > the user of APR decide what they need.
So apr_off_t will vary in length by platform/flags? A module that is compiled for --with-largefile isn't compatable with one built without the flag, since the offset of the next member of the apr_finfo_t and apr_file_t just jumped addr offset by a dword. Just clarifing. Bill
