On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Greg Stein wrote: > Yes, I was thinking the 2.0 names. Personally, I don't care about them at > all. I'd just as soon not worry about compat names for them, but was under > the impression that other people wanted API consistency with our previous > 2.0 alpha releases.
it would be easy to generate one, but everybody seemed ok with running the apr_rename.pl script on their project trees. i was under the impression we did not want compat foo for anything other than 1.3.x names, at least not in the cvs tree. > > btw, i missed one apr_clear_pool -> apr_pool_clear, ok to make that > > change? > > Of course :-) done.
