> -----Original Message-----
> > Um... how does this not infect the APR tree with the GPL? My
> > understanding is that we can redistribute the *output* of GNU development
> > tools like this, but not the actual tools themselves.
>
> If we can't distribute this file, then we can't use autoconf/libtool.
> Like the file says, we need these files, because we are more portable than
> the GNU tools we rely on.
I quote from config.guess (config.sub has the same block):
As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
Looks okay to me...
--Cliff
---------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
804-244-8615
Charlottesville, VA