> I'd also like to take a moment just to say that I'm describing what we > currently have.
much appreciate it. it's all network data, and you['ve basically already implemented an advanced version of what i was prating-about-with, two and a half years ago. > Pick your poison, and if the brigades and filters are not an appropriate > model for your data, then we can examine how to add an NAL concept to APR. brigades/filters are _very_ appropriate: see that other message where i described just how many layers we're having to deal with! extending those so that you can jump in/out at any point by making it look like it's terminated with a "socket", when in fact that "socket" is _yet another_ bucket brigade [on one OS, but not on another], would be a seriously powerful combination. luke ----- Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- "i want a world of dreams, run by near-sighted visionaries" "good. that's them sorted out. now, on _this_ world..."
