The problem is that the code you want to implement is incompatible with APR's dso code. In order to use the function that you want, you would need to start by using the system's dlopen. If you are going to use the systems dlopen, then you should use the systems dlclose.
What we really need, I guess, is apr_dso_put and apr_dso_get. That would follow the model that we currently have, instead of creating another function that would take the system type directly. Ryan On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > How is this different from apr_dso_unload? > > apr_dso_unload() takes an apr_dso_handle_t argument, so i would have todo > something ugly like: > > apr_dso_handle_t dso; > dso.handle = (void*)handle_from_perl; > dso.cont = p; > apr_dso_unload(&dso); > > which i couldn't do if i wanted to, since apr_dso_handle_t is an > incomplete type. > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
