[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> There is no need for apr_*printf formats to be compatible with OS printf
> calls. We have re-implemented apr_*printf because we needed better
> portability. In reality, that means that we could easily just define a
> single set of format strings.
Let's keep in mind that we get two huge benefits from apr_*printf()
formats matching OS printf calls:
1) trivial learning curve
2) !!!!!gcc (and certain other compiler) warnings keep us straight!!!!!
The ability to use printf() is not bad either, though of course we
could APR-ize further.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
