"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > trawick 01/05/13 08:34:18
> >
> > Modified: test test_apr.h testmd5.c testproc.c
> > Log:
> > fix some bad parms to printf/fprintf
> >
> > - printf("Error was %ld : %s\n", rv, strerror(rv)); \
> > + printf("Error was %d : %s\n", rv, strerror(rv)); \
>
> Do I smell a need for an APR_STATUS_T_FMT ? It doesn't seem we can assume
> this on 64 bit machines (?).
apr_status_t is always int so %d is always correct (though I suppose
the code in apr_errno.h could change).
I wouldn't mind seeing APR_STATUS_T_FMT though... Why should the user
stop to wonder which APR types are always the same and which are not?
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
