>> I do many 'official' rpm for the Apache Group and take a look >> at your spec : > >Euh... they aren't "ASF official". I know you build them, but I'm not >exactly sure where they are, and why we don't have the .spec >files in CVS.
Yes, there are not ASF official so the ' between official :) If you add a .spec in the top of tar.gz users could rebuild their own rpm by using rpm -ta xxx.tar.gz which is fine. >> - %configure fail since ./configure didn't exist. Must be >> a ./buildconf used before. > >This needs to be solved. The name of the license is also >"Apache Software >License" (not "Public"). I'll fix it in my http server (1.3/2.0/mod_ssl), jakarta and xml RPMs, where the Copyright is just 'Apache'. >Otherwise, it seems fine to me, and I'd be happy to add it to CVS. > >> - What about apr-utils ? Did you included it or will it be another >> RPM ? > >A separate one for apr-util would be nice, yes. Here we go, I'll send back an updated apr.spec to Daniel and let him send to list for definitive inclusion.... I could do the apr-util RPM...
