Could be!
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@apr.apache.org>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/locks/unix locks.c
> Isn't this another example where we should just die instead of returning
> an error?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > dreid 01/06/05 06:48:28
> >
> > Modified: locks/unix locks.c
> > Log:
> > One slipped through the rename, but got it now!
> >
> > Revision Changes Path
> > 1.50 +1 -1 apr/locks/unix/locks.c
> >
> > Index: locks.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/locks/unix/locks.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.49
> > retrieving revision 1.50
> > diff -u -r1.49 -r1.50
> > --- locks.c 2001/06/05 13:22:45 1.49
> > +++ locks.c 2001/06/05 13:48:25 1.50
> > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
> > apr_status_t apr_os_lock_put(apr_lock_t **lock, apr_os_lock_t
*thelock,
> > apr_pool_t *pool)
> > {
> > - if (cont == NULL) {
> > + if (pool == NULL) {
> > return APR_ENOPOOL;
> > }
> > if ((*lock) == NULL) {
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
>
> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
>
