On 6 Jun 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > Wow, so we have APR_NOFILE _and_ APR_ENOFILE? That's awfully confusing, > > don't you think? > > err umm no real opinion as to confusability... one is an error code > (APR_E*) and one isn't
Yeah, but if you're unfamiliar with the two and haven't actually gone out and looked at the header files, you might not even notice the 'E' > clearly APR_ENOFILE is useless and should be removed, so any possible > confusion should go away Clearly. =-) After that, I don't really have a problem with leaving APR_NOFILE as it is. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
