On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Ian Holsman wrote: > should apr_checkmask be called apr_date_checkmask? > > mod_proxy uses it to do ap_checkmask(buf, "HTTP/#.# ###*")
> > * @deffunc int apr_checkmask(const char *data, const char *mask) > > */ > > -APU_DECLARE(int) apr_checkmask(const char *data, const char *mask); > > +APU_DECLARE(int) apr_date_checkmask(const char *data, That's a good question. Until we answer it, to be consistent, I fixed the @deffunc docco to say "apr_date_checkmask" before I forgot about it. (I attributed it to you because I wouldn't have spotted it if you hadn't asked about the function. :-) I'm open to the possibility that apr_*_checkmask has more functionality than just date masks, meaning it should have a more generic name... anybody have an opinion one way or the other? --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
