> > > > rsync. librsync. > > > > > > Blech! > > > > *cackle*. forgot: so that includes mod_rproxy (which uses > > librsync). > > Hmm. Any chance that those apps would switch to use APR(UTIL)? (and thus, > our MD4) sander would like to do rsync2. martin pool (a known apache contributer) wrote mod_rproxy: he'd have to be asked.
> For new apps, why would somebody choose MD4 over MD5 or SHA1? Are there > particular benefits to using it? md4 is 16 times faster, but cryptographically (academically) less secure. don't know the theory, though. luke
