for various reasons i am prompted to ask, how would the idea of having an apr_ucs16 set of routines, apr_wstrcat, apr_wstrcpy, apr_wtolower, apr_wtoupper etc., be received?
on nt, it's easy: straightforward usage of the NT wstrcat, wstrcpy etc. lines. on unix, it's slightly more tricky, but easily doable. [and example code exists in samba, anyway: they've tried it there, but never yet completed it satisfactorily] iirc, glib has a unicode library, however it is ucs32 not ucs16, and depends on glib, which is an N-mbytes install, and not what i need, iow. how about it? :) luke
