On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 07:30:51PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Here's an idea: > > Leave apr_lock_create() alone (though I think some other folks wanna > muck with it :) ). > > Add apr_lock_create_np() (or some gstein-approved name) which > > 1) has the OS-specific details specified in enum parameters like in > the apr_lock_create() patch I posted > > 2) is for Real Men/Women(tm) who won't cry if a call to it won't > compile on Win32 or if we get smarter later and tweak the parameter > list > > (I imagine that apr_lock_create() will call apr_lock_create_np() and > tell it to use the default mechanism.) > > Okay, it's just a special name but it is clearly not in the set of > interfaces which folks would expect to work the same everywhere.
+1. That works for me. -- justin
