On 04 Jul 2001 21:16:56 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:01:35PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: > > This implements a hash table using shared memory. > > Limitations: > > * doesn't have a freelist, so deletes aren't reclaimed > > * and can't expand it's size (dont know how to implement this with > > current shared memory system) > > * no locking (yet) > > It is intended for use in modules having a large config requirements > > (Patches inline, extra files attached) > > > > It is intented that apr_shm_hash.c will live in apr/tables > > apr_shm_hash.h in apr/include > > & > > testhash.c in apr/test > > Cool. Can we revisit this once we have reworked the apr_shm interface? > I guess someone could commit this now, but it might make sense to hold > off until we have a decent SHM interface. And, ideally SHM could/should > be implemented around SMS. If so, that might change how this is > implemented. -- justin
In the conversations I have seen SMS was always talked about post 2.0 Release. Is this still the case?
