On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +1, personally I would prefer to have the length returned in the parameter > list.
I was leaning that way as well for consistency with apr_pstrcat(). > Or, we could do something I have been considering since I started > APR. We could create an apr_string_t. This would be a simple type, with > just a char * and a length. The goal would be to use an apr_string_t > whenever we already have a length. I would love to find a way to pack the > length into a simple C string, but since that isn't really possible, I > think creating a new string type might make sense. Oh yeah, I'd forgotten about that. I recall the discussions on that front from a while back... didn't Greg mention that he had such a beast in use somewhere (Subversion maybe)? Anyhow, it's a great idea and I'm all for it, but it will take a lot of work and some pretty widespread changes to put it to use, so an apr_pstrlencat() seems like a reasonable quick fix/stopgap measure to me. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
