[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It is. Please commit the change. We should not be regularly holding up > developers just to get a good build. When the server is stable, > sombody/anybody should tag and roll a new version. If the tree isn't > stable, we don't tag/roll. We should only be holding up developers if we > are absolutely sure we are about to get a good build. > > Ryan > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, David Reid wrote: > > > Well, have you looked at the patch? It doesn't change anything unless you > > turn > > on a switch in sms. > > > > However, I'll hold off... > > > > Thought the new business of tagging/rolling was supposed to get rid of all > > this > > bu**s**t? > > > > david > > > > Cliff Woolley wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, David Reid wrote: > > > > > > > OK, so I've had a couple of +1's for applying the patch, and 2.20 has > > > > been > > > > released, so anyone object if I do it now? > > > > > > Only problem is that 2.0.20 got vetoed as a beta. :-( Jeff checked in > > > some fixes for the prefork problem I think, but threaded might still be > > > foobar. Anyhow, I'm hoping we can have a 2.0.21 by midweek... > > > > > > Can the patch wait another couple days? I was just hoping to have as few > > > changes between 2.0.20 and 2.0.21 as possible so we can be sure that > > > nothing holds it up. If it's all ifdef'ed I guess it's no big deal... > > > > > > --Cliff > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Cliff Woolley > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Charlottesville, VA > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, I'll do it in about 124 hours or so when I've finished work and am home again :) david
