On Saturday 21 July 2001 09:44, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 11:29 AM > > > On Saturday 21 July 2001 09:16, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 08:07:50AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > > Here is my copy of the program. It seems to work properly whether or > > > > not apr_file_read() is used. > > > > > > Yup. Resetting the variable one did it. No problem here but my own > > > stupidity. > > > > > > Now the question is whether we should switch threaded MPM to use > > > apr_file_read rather than apr_recv? Does it make a difference? > > > > We set that MPM to use the pipe as a socket so that we can use apr_poll > > on the pipe. The underlying apr_recv and apr_read are basically the same > > function, so it really shouldn't matter. > > Not on Win32 they aren't (read != recv). This was the cause of years of > mod_proxy headaches when that module wasn't well maintained.
Well yeah, but that's why APR_FILE_AS_SOCKET exists. :-) Ryan _____________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
