We should really write a preface in the API docs ... when are apr_foo_t's == not equal :)
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:54 AM Subject: cvs commit: apr/memory/unix apr_sms_threads.c > trawick 01/07/27 09:54:44 > > Modified: memory/unix apr_sms_threads.c > Log: > gotta use apr_os_thread_equal() instead of comparing apr_os_thread_t > directly; the latter doesn't work on OS/390 > > Revision Changes Path > 1.3 +3 -3 apr/memory/unix/apr_sms_threads.c > > Index: apr_sms_threads.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/memory/unix/apr_sms_threads.c,v > retrieving revision 1.2 > retrieving revision 1.3 > diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 > --- apr_sms_threads.c 2001/07/18 18:41:37 1.2 > +++ apr_sms_threads.c 2001/07/27 16:54:44 1.3 > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ > > /* If the thread wasn't registered before, we will segfault */ > thread_node = SMS_THREADS_T(sms)->hashtable[hash]; > - while (thread_node->thread != thread) > + while (!apr_os_thread_equal(thread_node->thread, thread)) > thread_node = thread_node->next; > > node = thread_node->used_sentinel.prev; > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ > hash = THREAD_HASH(thread); > > thread_node = SMS_THREADS_T(sms)->hashtable[hash]; > - while (thread_node->thread != thread) > + while (!apr_os_thread_equal(thread_node->thread, thread)) > thread_node = thread_node->next; > > node->avail_size += node->first_avail - > @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ > apr_lock_acquire(SMS_THREADS_T(sms)->lock); > > thread_node = SMS_THREADS_T(sms)->hashtable[hash]; > - while (thread_node->thread != thread) > + while (!apr_os_thread_equal(thread_node->thread, thread)) > thread_node = thread_node->next; > > if ((*thread_node->ref = thread_node->next) != NULL) > > > >
