Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:15:31AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Is this the right way to do things? Or should there be a mapping to APR_LDAP_* status codes from LDAP_* status codes?
I'd suggest that we should map the APR_LDAP_* status codes from LDAP_*. We can do this by allocating an offset. So, just do:
apr_status_t status = ldap_fn_result_code + APR_LDAP_ERROR_START;
or something like that. We have that precedent somewhere. How many numbers would we need? I don't remember how many the LDAP library defines. -- justin
would it be possible to have a apr_ldap_errstr( apr_status_t ) function which would
convert the numbers into messages?
