On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Greg Stein wrote: > (2) is flat out wrong: you need to "cvs rm" it so the "state" is correct > within the file. It needs to be "dead" rather than just moved to the Attic.
Oops, yeah, what you said. =-) > And the technique is also prone to error. Even tho you remove the tags, > checking out by date will create spurious files (i.e. the "new" file will > appear in old checkouts). > > "cvs add" and "cvs rm" with a pointer in the new file to the old is the > safest all around. Whatever. We've typically kept the history when we did this in the past, but I don't much care. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
