> I'm all for a new apr-ldap CVS module / library. But its presence in APRUTIL > feels very questionable to me.
Well, since I feel the same way about everything in apr-util, I'm not sure if I agree or disagree with Greg. I think it belongs in httpd-ldap, for the same reason, but if apr-util is going to contain things like xml and dbm, then it should also contain ldap. *shrug* ....Roy
