On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 08:05:03PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > Adding an option to apr_pool_create_ex to indicate that the pool is > going to be shared across threads would be an option I can certainly > live with. OTOH, this will introduce an extra if(lock) pair in the > apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc calls. I'll send in a patch later on.
If you aren't shared, you have an extra NULL-check. I think that is acceptable. If you are shared, we make sure we can't get trounced. > I didn't implement apr_prealloc yet, but would like to know if people > would find it usefull. If so, I will post a patch. Probably - I've come across the need for such a function before. But, it does get to be tricky to implement. -- justin
