Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 31 August 2001 07:48, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> -1 This is where we were before I made the change a few weeks
> ago. APR-util relies on APR to build, duplicating the build logic
> is a bad idea, because like all duplicate code, it opens up places
> for bugs to hide.
That's just plain silly. Copying a file from apr to apr-util doesn't
introduce more places for bugs to hide, any more than copying a
libtool-provided .m4 into one of our own does. And this sort of
"duplication" has little relation to the changes you allude to.
Do you have a real reason not to commit this, or alternatively, your
own working solution you can commit?
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
