> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 September 2001 18:20
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:19:01AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > I would like to move APR to a releasable state finally. To do > this, we need to > > finish the locking API at the very least. Does anybody have > other issues that > > need to be resolved? > > Oh, I'd like to consider Sander's pool re-implementation and Shall I repost it? [I've updated it a bit] Ian scheduled to do some perf testing with it, don't know if he got around to doing that. > Madhu's shared memory patch. Both of these don't change the API, > so I don't think it affects the "releasability" of APR. > > (I think releasable state means that no API changes occur without > three +1s - code may still be C-T-R - that's my take on it...) > > They can wait until I get around to it, or someone beats me to it. > -- justin Sander
