On Friday 28 September 2001 10:33 am, Branko Čibej wrote: > Ryan Bloom wrote: > >I would suggest not using a thread ID. They are incedibly non-portable. > >Windows uses HANDLEs instead of ints. > > Not exactly. Windows has both thread handles and thead IDs. Use > GetCurrentThread to get a handle, and GetCurrentThreadId to get an int. > > And anyway, a hash key doesn't have to be an int. Any kind of unique > object will do. I doubt there's a threading library that doesn't have > some sort of unique thread identifier available.
I am saying that today's APR doesn't have integer based thread ID's on all platforms, nor should it need to. I am also saying that using a hash is just plain wrong for this. It will be faster, and easier with just a simple array. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
