From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:32 PM


> I think it should just say this:
> 
> {
>     apr_pool_cleanup_kill(file->cntxt, file, apr_unix_file_cleanup);
>     return apr_unix_file_cleanup(file);
> }
> 
> Which is exactly equivalent to what apr_dir_close() does now that it's
> been fixed.  Thoughts?

Thinking ... yes.

Clear, concise, and less redundant.


Reply via email to