In preparation for some bigger APR makefile changes that I'll be making
soon, I noticed that some of the files we reference in the makefile
would be better off rooted in $(top_srcdir). Does this look like the
right thing to do here?
-aaron
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -r1.55 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 2001/09/14 14:10:05 1.55
+++ Makefile.in 2001/10/11 18:45:18
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
delete-lib:
@if test -f $(TARGET_LIB); then \
@@ -52,11 +53,11 @@
install: $(TARGET_LIB)
if [ ! -d $(includedir) ]; then \
- $(srcdir)/build/mkdir.sh $(includedir); \
+ $(top_srcdir)/build/mkdir.sh $(includedir); \
fi; \
- cp include/*.h $(includedir); \
+ cp $(top_srcdir)/include/*.h $(includedir); \
if [ ! -d $(libdir) ]; then \
- $(srcdir)/build/mkdir.sh $(libdir); \
+ $(top_srcdir)/build/mkdir.sh $(libdir); \
fi; \
$(LIBTOOL) --mode=install cp $(TARGET_LIB) $(libdir)
$(LIBTOOL) --mode=install cp APRVARS $(libdir)
@@ -81,10 +82,10 @@
fi
$(TARGET_EXPORTS):
- $(MKEXPORT) include/*.h > $@
+ $(MKEXPORT) $(top_srcdir)/include/*.h > $@
dox:
- doxygen docs/doxygen.conf
+ doxygen $(top_srcdir)/docs/doxygen.conf
test: $(TARGET_LIB)
(cd test; make clean; make; \
