On 19 Oct 2001 23:25:28 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >aaron 01/10/19 16:25:28 > > Modified: include apr_portable.h > locks/beos proc_mutex.c > locks/netware proc_mutex.c > locks/os2 proc_mutex.c > locks/unix proc_mutex.c > locks/win32 proc_mutex.c > Log: > Implement portable accessors for proc mutex. These are equivalent to > apr_os_lock_get/set, but they work for apr_proc_mutex_t types instead. > > I did my best to implement these on non-Unix platforms from how I saw > them implemented for apr_os_lock_get/set, but on those platforms they > are untested.
Well, this actually breaks things on OS/2 (& probably Win32), not because there's anything wrong with it but because proc mutexes aren't yet implemented on either platform so there's no os handle in the apr_proc_mutex_t to get/set. I guess I should actually implement them, so are they supposed to be like APR_LOCKALL or APR_CROSS_PROCESS locks? -- ______________________________________________________________________________ | Brian Havard | "He is not the messiah! | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
