Brian Pane wrote:
3. Keep using apr_table_t for the fields in request_rec, and redesign the internals of apr_table_t to support O(log(n)) access Pros: * Performance improvement for the httpd * Almost no impact on code that uses APR Cons: * Changes required to code that uses apr_table_elts() (on the order of half a dozen calls in Apache 2.0, and occasional usage in the handful of large 3rd-party modules that I've checked)
Comments?
This seems the best way to go. Perhaps apr_table_elts should be replaced by a set of iterators, like apr_hash_first/next?
-- Brane Čibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
