I was wondering if anybody had a chance to review the both the patches (SHMEM, SHMHT & SHMCB).. I'd be really interested in knowing your feedback..
-Madhu -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:04 AM To: [email protected]; Cliff Woolley; '[email protected]' Subject: Re: [PATCH]1. SHMEM (repost) On Tuesday 06 November 2001 10:26 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > >I guess I'd also like to know what value this shared memory cache adds > > >for mod_ssl. I'm not at all clear on how shared memory would make > > >SSL any better - as SSL is only a connection-oriented protocol and > > >shouldn't use shared memory. None of the MPMs in httpd migrate > > >connections between processes (I don't see this changing anytime soon). > > >Since SSL works on the connection level, I'm not sure what this is. > > >So, I guess some explanation here would do wonders. -- justin > > Anyway, what about perchild? That MPM does in fact pass connections (or > is it just requests?) from one process to another. Do perchild and > mod_ssl even work together? I've never tried it. Perchild hasn't worked properly since we removed BUFF. I worked on it for a while, but I didn't see a solution to the problem. A few weeks ago, I did see the solution, which was to use a filter to solve the problem of not having the data to send to the other child. I'm hoping to fix this in the next two weeks. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
