On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 00:58, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:11:37PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > how about we add 2 new config options > > > > --with-berkeley-db-include > > > > --with-berkeley-db-lib > > > > and let the user specify? > > > > > > I'd rather not force the user to manually specify it if at all > > > possible. What's wrong with that snippet? First check to > > > see if libdb2 exists - if not, then try libdb. We really ought > > > to check for db2/db.h as well (then try db.h). -- justin > > > > Just my $.02 worth. Subversion, which requires Berkeley DB 3.3.11, > > will check your system in All The Usual Places for such, but we also > > allow a --with-berkeley-db option to configure. > > Right, I'm not particularly against that config option, but I > am against us not looking in "All The Usual Places" first. We > can only look at so many places, but I think it is reasonable > to look in db2/db.h and check for libdb2.so. My $.02. -- justin
that sounds good.
