Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:35:01PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
Some test results, thanks to Ian H.: http://webperf.org/a2/v30/ This compares today's httpd-2.0 CVS head with my "recycle pools" patch for the worker MPM and Sander's new implementation of pools.
Sander's pool code yielded a substantial drop in usr CPU consumption (see the "cpuu" links on the test result pages) and a corresponding increase in throughput. My worker MPM patch was faster than
So, is this a +1 from you? =) -- justin
My +1 is nonbinding in APR, but I'm in favor of replacing the current pool code with Sander's faster version, once some more people have had a chance to read and critique the code.
--Brian
