On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:11 am, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > The biggest problem is that this would change the API for the one > > function that must be in every APR program. > > > > Thoughts? > > Is it the lock routine or something specific to apr_pool_init that is > creating the tmpfile? In general I think given the current state of
It is the apr_pool_init function, which is creating the lock with a NULL fname, so it is a bigger problem than just the pool lock. > apr_file_mktemp and that we create cross-process locks that need tmp > files, a full /tmp will still be a problem in other places in the app. > > Maybe apr_initialize could take a path to create all tmp files in > (or was that what you were suggesting)? It is the next logical step to what I was suggesting. I will through something together today. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
