Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:41:18PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Shortly after these commits I get the following on a system with libtool
> > 1.3.4. Coincidence?
>
> Probably not. ...
...
> 1) Is it possible you have --disable-shared turned on? I'm not
nope
> sure if this would affect libtool, but it might turn off
> dependency checks. All we want to do is populate the
> dependency_libs variable in libapr(util).la. Passing the
> library names at link-time seems to be the way to do it.
> In addition, these variables could also be passed on to the
> linker which could in theory barf on them when building a
> static library. I just don't know. (What OS is this?)
Linux
> 2) It is possible that the dependency generation of older
> libtools is broken. I'd suggest that the benefit of
> upgrading to this scheme (i.e. removing export_vars.sh
> and relying on libtool to handle it) is worth forcing
> developers to upgrade to whatever version has correct
> dependency handling (my guess would be libtool 1.4+).
I don't have a big problem with upgrading. Somebody needs to figure
out what libtool we really require now and go fix the version checking
logic in buildconf.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
