> From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 December 2001 19:44 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: APR_POOL_DEBUG and apr_pool_tag() > > > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > >"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>This sounds like good moment to introduce for APR_POOL_TAG. > >> > > > >fine by me... > > > > One of the things that made the original pool code difficult > to maintain was that it had so many different ifdefs for > debugging. I think it would be cleaner to leave out APR_POOL_TAG > and just enable the non-noop version of apr_pool_tag() all the > time. In fact, I think that any "non-performance-impacting" > debug code in the new pools should be enabled by default, so > that in the event of a crash we'll be able to gather some extra > diagnostic information immediately, without having to first > recompile with debug flags and wait for the crash to happen > again. > > --Brian
Valid argument. I'll take care of it straight away. Sander
