On Tuesday 08 January 2002 12:41 pm, Mladen Turk wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Aaron Bannert'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:53 PM > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] apr_shm_t, a new shared memory API to replace old > > > > > > I'm also looking at the API and understand why you were worried about the > > anon. But what you describe is a hybrid, a named, anon shm. For now, we > > will be using backing files; adding both keyed and named create where the > > platform supports both is a reasonable potential improvement in the > future. > > > > The reason for using a filename and a NAME for that file (that was my > initial post to Aaron) has nothing to do with the keyed/named created shms. > Simply, the Apache could create whatever shmem file with some NAME, and the > rest of the world can access it simply using that NAME.
I'm confused, the NAME is the filename. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
