On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 11:02:39AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > This patch is verified to work on AIX 4.2.1, but it was suggested > to me by the reporter (Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) that we do > the same for other platforms for things like _REENTRANT and I > agree. Does anyone see a reason not to do this?
I think there are some platforms that will do bad things when _REENTRANT is defined for some libraries and not for others. I think it's best to always define that wherever possible. (AIX brain damage excluded.) > installations of APR in threaded and non-threaded modes. Will we > eventually go to the libapr.so and libapr_r.so modes? I don't like this approach. The reason you would do it for libc and libc_r is that the codebase is completely separate. Our code is unified and we'd require a two-pass compilation system. I'm not sure I'd like that. We'd need to think long and hard before splitting it out like that. -- justin
