From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:25 AM
> From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:48 PM
>
> > Some more work on the subject...
> >
> --- dso.c 28 Jan 2002 15:56:08 -0000 1.27
> +++ dso.c 28 Jan 2002 21:44:57 -0000
> @@ -158,8 +164,14 @@
> struct apr_dso_handle_t *handle,
> const char *symname)
> {
> - *ressym = (apr_dso_handle_sym_t)GetProcAddress(handle->handle, symname);
> +#if _WIN32_WCE
> + apr_wchar_t wsymname[256];
>
> + MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, symname, strlen(symname), wsymname, 255);
> + *ressym = (apr_dso_handle_sym_t)GetProcAddressW(handle->handle,
> wsymname);
> +#else
> + *ressym = (apr_dso_handle_sym_t)GetProcAddress(handle->handle, symname);
> +#endif
> if (!*ressym) {
>
>
> Your SEM changes in this file are fine. But you cannot use MBtWC. APR is
> implemented in terms of a single charset. GStein has asked that we be able
> to change that, which we might at some point. But it's absolutely
> unacceptable
> to go from narrow mapping to another. Please replace with the utf-8 ->
> unicode
> change so we can get this one commited.
>
> This is one platform where 'local' charset is senseless - map it all utf-8 and
> you have a 1:1 mapping to the one-and-only charset on CE :)
I just reread this... ick. Please go to the standard mechanisms for both CE and
WinNT family (just as if it were a filename.) You caught me asleep at the
wheel,
I thought I was near done with fooA symbols on NT :)
BTW - you need to add your recent APR_HAS/HAVE additions to apr.h.in. No more
patches committed till I get that patch :)
Bill
