On 7 Feb 2002 00:38:18 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >gstein 02/02/06 16:38:18 > > Modified: build find_apr.m4 > Log: > be a bit more restrictive: look for an exectuable apr-config, rather > than just an existing file. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.8 +1 -1 apr/build/find_apr.m4 > > Index: find_apr.m4 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/build/find_apr.m4,v > retrieving revision 1.7 > retrieving revision 1.8 > diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 > --- find_apr.m4 6 Feb 2002 11:41:57 -0000 1.7 > +++ find_apr.m4 7 Feb 2002 00:38:18 -0000 1.8 > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ > if test -x "$withval/bin/apr-config"; then > apr_found="yes" > apr_config="$withval/bin/apr-config" > - elif test -f "$withval/apr-config"; then > + elif test -x "$withval/apr-config"; then > apr_found="yes" > apr_config="$withval/apr-config" > elif test -x "$withval" && $withval --help > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then
Was there any actual need to do this? I ask because it breaks the OS/2 build due to the fact that OS/2 has no 'x' bit in the file system. "test -x" is only true if the file has a .exe extension which apr-config obviously does not. -- ______________________________________________________________________________ | Brian Havard | "He is not the messiah! | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
