A question for the list - are we really working in microsecond resolutions?
(Win32 is to the nearest 10 microseconds, I'm guessing others aren't that
precise.) If so, what would you choose as a divisor, since we could certainly
pick a better divisor than USEC_PER_SEC for randomness.
> wrowe 02/02/11 17:27:09
>
> Modified: file_io/unix mktemp.c
> Log:
> I hope the clocks have sufficient resolution to make this randomization
> useful. Comments? We may need to divide, not necessarily by USEC_PER_SEC
> but perhaps by a nice binary value.
>
> Submitted by: Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.21 +7 -1 apr/file_io/unix/mktemp.c
>
> --- mktemp.c 18 Jan 2002 19:16:29 -0000 1.20
> +++ mktemp.c 12 Feb 2002 01:27:09 -0000 1.21
> @@ -130,7 +136,7 @@
> apr_uint32_t randnum;
>
> if (randseed==0) {
> - randseed = time(NULL);
> + randseed = (int)apr_time_now();
> seedrandom(randseed);
> }
>
>
>
>
>
