On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Thom May wrote: > > > +apr_network_service_byname_get from apr_getservbyname > > > +apr_network_ip_subnet_create from apr_ipsubnet_create > > > +apr_network_ip_subnet_test from apr_ipsubnet_test > > > +apr_network_socket_inherit_set from apr_socket_set_inherit > > > +apr_network_socket_inherit_unset from apr_socket_unset_inherit > > > > Why put the word network in? > > > Agreed, but again in terms of consistency I felt I should list them.
On some of them, maybe. But on the apr_socket_*, no. Our naming convention is that the function is named after the apr_foo_t type it operates on, not what header file it's in. apr_socket_set_inherit operates on an apr_socket_t, so the name is correct. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
