"Blair Zajac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some interesting comments from a RedHat developer on why
> APR should not include /usr/include/asm/atomic.h on Linux platforms
> at line 160 of apr/include/apr_atomic.h
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63643
>
> Maybe someone more familiar with the atomic code should take a
> look at it.
So, at the end, did we decide to keep atomic or to drop them? I have some
code relying on those for the WebApp module and would like to know whether I
have to patch it and use intra-process locks or just leave it as is :)
Thanks for hints :)
Pier
--
I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S.
President. B.W. Fitzpatrick