On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Now, the question is _why_ that thing is called and why libsvn_ra_local.so > does not exist (if shared is disabled, it should be compiled in, right?)...
I was under the impression that it was one of those things of SVN attempting to load all extensions (with no preconceived notions of which ones exist and which ones don't). Right? --Cliff
