* Ryan Bloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Feel free, but I don't think we want to actually tag or release that > version in CVS. If we tag that, it becomes something of an official > release, which means we have to support it. I would much rather see us > put the effort forth to make APR release quality and release it. > +1 -Thom
> Ryan > > ---------------------------------------------- > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > San Francisco, CA > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:56 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Packaging/version question > > > > Hi folks. For creating binary packages of APR and APR-util, would it > be > > acceptable to use package versions of "0.9" until an official APR > > release is made, since I've seen talk of the first release being > "1.0"? > > > > Regards, > > > > joe -- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
