Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
IIRC, I did macroize it during my test runs (at one point at least -
I may not have committed it) and found no performance improvement.
The problems seemed to be with the function pointer itself. It's all
a little fuzzy though, so it's possible I didn't macroize.
A better solution, IMHO, would be just to code a drop-in replacement for memory/unix/apr_pools.c. -- justin
Perhaps it would be useful to know exactly what benchmarks people are using to identify the impact of these changes.
-- Emery
