On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: > Also, isn't it true that your patch now causes the buffer bucket to always > have 0-7 unused bytes at the end?
Oh duh, nevermind on this point, my fault. I misread the loop condition. --Cliff
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: > Also, isn't it true that your patch now causes the buffer bucket to always > have 0-7 unused bytes at the end?
Oh duh, nevermind on this point, my fault. I misread the loop condition. --Cliff