Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/win32 proc.c

[Branko Äibej]

Incidentally, I'm beginning to suspect that the root cause of the 
problem wasn't the patch itself, but the fact that apr_file_inherit_set 
is a noop.

BTW, why are the apr_*_inherit set functions declared void, not 
apr_status_t?

Branko Äibej wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brane       2002/07/02 15:25:52
 Modified:    threadproc/win32 proc.c
 Log:
 Reverting the 1.76 and 1.77 changes, because they didn't work.
 The child handles weren't properly inheritable, and redirected command
 output got lost in the bit bucket.
There was a nice comment in that code about why we couldn't use 
apr_file_dup. Anyway, I'm looking at the handle leaks right now.



--
Brane Äibej   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/