On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Ian Holsman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here is the patch to use apr_poll instead of select. This is just being > > posted for completeness, not because I believe it will actually perform as > > well as the standard poll() implementation. Bill offered to benchmark it, > > so I am posting it. I will re-implement apr_poll() tomorrow to offer much > > better performance, and I will post a new patch based on that sometime > > tomorrow. > > > > Once we have actual numbers for all three implementations of > > wait_for_io_or_timeout, we can have an intelligent conversation about the > > best one to use, based on code complexity and performance. > > is there any way to remove the need for the pool create and pcallocs > that the socket-add does?
I believe that there is, and it will be a part of my new poll implementation. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
